Like Jair Bolsonaro, the freedom-loving Conservative leader of Brazil from 2019-2023 (who was voted out of office after one term, then had a legal mandate leveled against him, barring him from being able to run again until 2030), Argentina swept their new leader, the uniquely-coiffed Javier Milei, into office in 2023. Milei, like Bolsonaro and Trump, has been pushing back against Globalist entities (like the UN) and their dangerous agendas, during his tenure.
On September 24, 2024, Milei ignited a firestorm when he spoke for the first time directly to the UN on their own turf (and hence, directly to the enemy) after refusing to sign their "Pact for the Future," an offshoot of the original 1992 Agenda 21, subsequently renamed Agenda 2030 - which was unanimously adopted by nearly all member states on September 22, 2024.
In Milei's speech (translated to English below), he correctly stated that the UN, for all its good intentions at its inception, has become "a multi-tentacled
Leviathan, which seeks to
decide not only
what each nation-state should do, but also how all the citizens of the world
should live." At least, live according to them, not to individual sovereign nation states, and certainly not not to the human individual.
Because Milei opted to "kick the hornet's nest," it should not be long before we see one or all of these things begin to take place, not necessarily in this order:
- Like Trump, an attempt on Milei's life.
- "Sudden" riots, political backlashes, and other efforts toward destabilization cropping up in some of the more politically divided, or marginalized sectors of the country.
- An opposing candidate, who will seemingly come out of nowhere; and because HE (or she) is in bed with, and being funded by, the CIA/Deep State/TPTB/Elites, this candidate will be pushed, and pushed hard, as the new "savior" over that "wicked" or "crazy" Milei, until he is completely removed, and the new man or woman can be put into Argentina's leadership role.
Historically, this has happened myriad times across the world, and in fact, now seems to be standard CIA modus operandi.
But until that starts to happen, here is what Javier Milei had to say to the UN:
---
To the authorities of the United Nations, to the
representatives of the various countries that make up the United Nations, and to
all the citizens of the world who are watching us: good afternoon. And to all
the citizens of the world who are watching us, good afternoon. For those who do
not know, I am not a politician,
I am an economist, a libertarian liberal economist, who has never had the
ambition to be a politician. I am an economist, a liberal libertarian economist,
who has never had the ambition to be a politician but who was who was honored
with the position of President of the Argentine Republic, in the face of the
resounding failure of more than a century of collectivist policies. A century of
collectivist policies that destroyed our country.
This is my first speech -- in front of the United
Nations General Assembly -- and I would like to take this opportunity to -- with
humility -- alert the various nations of the world to the path they have been
treading for decades and the danger of this organization's failure to fulfill
its original mission.
I do not come here to tell the world what to do; I
come here to tell the world, on the one hand, what will happen if the United
Nations continues to promote collectivist policies, which they have been
promoting under the mandate of the
2030 Agenda, and, on the other hand, what are
the values that the new Argentina defends. I do want to begin by giving credit
where credit is due. The United Nations organization was born out of the horror
of the bloodiest war in global history with the main objective that it should
never happen again. To
that end, the organization set its fundamental principles in stone, in the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. A basic agreement was set down there,
based on a maxim: that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and
rights.
Under the tutelage of this organization and the
adoption of these ideas -- during the last 70 years -- humanity experienced the
longest period of global peace in history, which also coincided with the period
of the greatest economic growth in history. An
international forum was created
where nations could settle their conflicts through cooperation instead of
resorting -- instantly -- to arms, and something unthinkable was achieved: the
five largest powers in the world were permanently seated1 at the same table, each
with the same veto power, despite having totally opposing interests.
All this did not make the scourge of war
disappear, but it was achieved -- for the time being -- that no conflict
escalated to global proportions. The result was that we went from having two
world wars in less than 40 years, which together claimed more than 120 million
lives, to having 70 consecutive years of relative peace and global stability,
under the mantle of an order that allowed the whole world to integrate
commercially, compete and prosper. Because where there is trade, there are no
bullets --
Bastiat used to say2
-- because trade guarantees
peace, freedom guarantees trade and equality before the law guarantees freedom.
In short, what the Prophet Isaiah wrote and what
is read in the park, crossing the street, was fulfilled:
God will judge between the nations and will arbitrate for many peoples; they
will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning shears.
Nation shall not take sword against Nation; they shall know war no more.3
This is what has happened -- mostly -- under the
aegis of the United Nations, in its first decades, and therefore, from this
perspective, we are talking about a remarkable success in the history of nations
that cannot be overlooked.
However -- at some point -- and as it usually happens
with most of the bureaucratic
structures that we men create, this organization ceased to watch over the
principles outlined in its founding declaration, and began to mutate. An
organization that had been intended -- essentially -- as a shield to protect the
Kingdom of Man was transformed into a multi-tentacled
Leviathan, which seeks to
decide not only
what each nation-state should do, but also how all the citizens of the world
should live. This is how we went from an organization that pursued peace to an
organization that imposes an ideological agenda on its members, on a myriad of
issues, which make the life of man in society.
The successful model of the United Nations, whose
origins can be traced back to the ideas of President Wilson, who
spoke of the
society of "peace without victory" and which was based on the cooperation of
nation states, has been abandoned; it has been replaced by a model of
supranational government of international
bureaucrats who seek to impose a certain way of life on the citizens of the
world. What is being discussed -- this week, here, in New York, at the
Summit of
the Future -- is nothing other than the deepening of this tragic course that this
institution has adopted. Thus, the deepening of a model that -- in the words of
the
Secretary of the United Nations himself -- requires the definition of a new
social contract on a global scale, redoubling the commitments of the 2030
Agenda.
I want to be clear on the position of the
Argentine agenda: the 2030 Agenda, although well-intentioned in its goals, is
nothing more than a supranational government program, socialist in nature, which
seeks to solve the problems of modernity with solutions that violate the
sovereignty of nation states and violate people's right to life, liberty and
property. It is an agenda that pretends to solve poverty, inequality and
discrimination with legislation that only deepens them. Because world history
shows that the only way to guarantee prosperity is by limiting the power of the
monarch, guaranteeing equality before the law and defending the right to life,
liberty and property of individuals.
It has been precisely the adoption of this agenda,
which obeys privileged interests, the abandonment of the principles -- outlined
in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations -- that has
distorted the role of this institution and put it on the wrong path. Thus, we
have seen how an organization, born to
defend the rights of man, has been one of the main proponents of the systematic
violation of freedom, as -- for example -- with the
global quarantines during the
year 2020, which should be considered a crime against humanity.
In this same House that claims to defend human
rights, they have allowed bloody dictatorships such as Cuba and Venezuela to
join the Human Rights Council without the slightest reproach. In this same House
that claims to defend women's rights, they allow countries that punish their
women for showing their skin to join the Committee on the Elimination of
Discrimination against Women. In this same House -- systematically -- they have
voted against the State of Israel, which is the only country in the Middle East
that defends liberal democracy, while simultaneously demonstrating a total
inability to respond to the scourge of terrorism. In the economic sphere,
collectivist policies have been promoted that threaten economic growth, violate
property rights, and hinder the natural economic process, preventing the most
underprivileged countries in the world from freely enjoying their own resources
in order to move forward. Regulations and prohibitions promoted precisely by the
countries that developed thanks to doing the same thing they condemn today.
Moreover, a toxic relationship has been promoted between global governance
policies and international lending agencies,
requiring the most neglected countries to commit resources they do not have to
programs they do not need, turning them into perpetual debtors to promote the
agenda of the global elites.
Nor has the tutelage of the World Economic Forum
helped, where ridiculous policies are promoted with Malthusian blinders on --
such as "Zero Emission" policies -- which harm poor countries in particular. To
policies linked to sexual and reproductive rights, when the birth rate in
Western countries is plummeting,
heralding a bleak future for all. Nor has the organization satisfactorily
fulfilled its mission of defending the territorial sovereignty of its members,
as we Argentines know firsthand, in the relationship with the Malvinas (Falkland) Islands.
And we have even reached a situation in which the Security Council, which is the
most important organ of this House, has become distorted, because the veto of
its permanent members has begun to be used in defense of the particular
interests of some.
Thus we are today, with an organization that is
powerless to provide solutions to real global conflicts, such as the aberrant
Russian invasion of Ukraine, which has already cost the lives of more than
300,000 people, leaving a trail of more than one million wounded in the process.
An organization that, instead of confronting
these conflicts, invests time and effort in imposing on poor countries what, how
and what they should produce, with whom they should associate, what they should
eat and what they should believe in, as the present Pact for the Future intends
to dictate. This long list of errors and contradictions has not been gratuitous, but has resulted in the loss of credibility of the United Nations in
the eyes of the citizens of the free world and in the denaturalization of its
functions.
Therefore, I would like to issue a warning: we are
at the end of a cycle. Collectivism and moral posturing of the woke agenda,
have collided with reality and no longer have credible solutions to offer to the
world's real problems. In fact, they never had them. If the 2030 Agenda failed
--
as its own promoters acknowledge -- the answer should be to ask ourselves if it
was not an ill-conceived program to begin with, accept that reality and change
course. We cannot pretend to persist in the mistake by redoubling the bet on an
agenda that has failed. The same thing always happens with ideas coming from the
left: they design a model according to what human beings should be -- according
to them -- and when individuals -- freely -- act otherwise, they have no better
solution than to restrict, repress and restrict their freedom.
We -- in Argentina -- have already seen with our own
eyes what lies at the end of this road of envy and sad passions: poverty,
brutalization, anarchy, and a fatal absence of freedom. We still have time to
turn away from this course.
I want to be clear about something so that there
are no misinterpretations: Argentina, which is undergoing a profound process of
change, has decided to embrace the ideas of freedom; those ideas that say that
all citizens are born free and equal before the law, that we have inalienable
rights granted by the Creator,
among which are the right to life, liberty and property. Those principles, which
guide the process of change that we are carrying out in Argentina, are also the
principles that will guide our international conduct from now on.
We believe in the defense of life for all; we
believe in the defense of property for all; we believe in freedom of speech for
all; we believe in freedom of worship for all; we believe in freedom of commerce
for all; and we believe in limited governments, all of them.
And because in these times what happens in one
country quickly impacts others, we believe that all peoples should live free
from tyranny and oppression, whether it takes the form of political oppression,
economic slavery or religious fanaticism. That fundamental idea must not remain
mere words; it must be supported in
deeds, diplomatically, economically and materially, through the combined
strength of all countries, which stand for freedom.
This doctrine of the new Argentina is no more and
no less than the true essence of the United Nations Organization, that is, the
cooperation of the United Nations in defense of freedom. If the United Nations
decides to retake the principles that gave it life and to adapt again the role
for which it was conceived, you can count on the unwavering support of Argentina
in the struggle for freedom.
You should also know that Argentina will not
support any policy that implies the restriction of individual freedoms, of
trade, or the violation of the natural rights of individuals, no matter who
promotes it or how much consensus that institution has. For this reason, we wish
to express -- officially -- our dissent on the Pact of the Future, signed on
Sunday, and we invite all the nations of the free world to join us, not only in
dissenting from this pact, but also in the creation of a new agenda for this
noble institution: the agenda of freedom.
From this day on, know that the Argentine Republic
will abandon the position of historical neutrality that characterized us and
will be at the forefront of the struggle in defense of freedom. Because -- as
Thomas Paine said -- "those who wish to reap the blessings of freedom must -- as
men -- endure the fatigue of defending it."
May God bless the Argentines and all the citizens
of the world, and may the forces of heaven be with us.
Long live freedom, dammit!
Thank you very much.
---
PRAY FOR JAVIER MILEI & THE ARGENTINIAN PEOPLE. They now have targets on their backs! 🎯
(transcription can also be found here: https://tinyurl.com/233p5c5v)
(it should be noted that Kim has since become a follower of Jesus Christ!). 