Some men just need killin
CNN.com - Officials: Dad kills neighbor accused of molesting girl - Aug 30, 2006:
And the guy lived with his mother. "James' 87-year-old mother discovered his body."
And the guy lived with his mother. "James' 87-year-old mother discovered his body."
They should fire him and then arrest him
local6.com - Local News - Teacher Burns 2 American Flags In Class To Motivate Students
Completely unnecessary and completely over the top!!! >:-(
Completely unnecessary and completely over the top!!! >:-(
List of Islamic Terror Attacks for 2006
WOW. This is one heck of a scary list.
List of Islamic attacks within the last few months:
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index.html#Attacks
List of Islamic attacks within the last few months:
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index.html#Attacks
Signs, signs, everywhere are signs Pt. 3
THE CASHLESS SOCIETY IS HERE by Chris Beard
Technology: Preparing for the Mark of the Beast
Signs of the Times: Technology
BIOCHIP 666/NOAHIDE LAWS & NEW WORLD ORDER by "The Cutting Edge" Radio Program
Today's Reality of 666
Smart Card Info and Links
Technology: Preparing For The Mark by Pastor Ron Graff
666 and World Economic Life by Irvin Baxter Jr.
The Smart Card - A Way To Control The World? by DL Dewey
The Future Foretold: The Mark of the Beast
http://www.cloudtenpictures.com/
Hi-Tech Control (with Links to News articles and Government Websites!)
Countdown to Armageddon
Technology: Preparing for the Mark of the Beast
Signs of the Times: Technology
BIOCHIP 666/NOAHIDE LAWS & NEW WORLD ORDER by "The Cutting Edge" Radio Program
Today's Reality of 666
Smart Card Info and Links
Technology: Preparing For The Mark by Pastor Ron Graff
666 and World Economic Life by Irvin Baxter Jr.
The Smart Card - A Way To Control The World? by DL Dewey
The Future Foretold: The Mark of the Beast
http://www.cloudtenpictures.com/
Hi-Tech Control (with Links to News articles and Government Websites!)
Countdown to Armageddon
Signs, signs, everwhere are signs Pt. 2
RFID Technology - the next step in barcodes
What you aren't being told about the Verichip
The Coming Cashless Society by Gregg London
The Mark Of The Beast (666)
Who's tracking you?
Social Chaos leads to Mark of the Beast
Moving toward a cashless society
Smart technology raises questions
Snooping by Satellite
Tracking you wherever you drive
Out of milk? Your fridge can notify your local market when it's spoiled too
Smart home appliances too smart:
http://www.spartechsoftware.com/dimensions/mystical/MarkOfTheBeast.htm
How does the world today fulfill the End Times?
Conspiracy Planet - National ID Cards/Microchips - Mark of the Beast: Get Chipped (TM)
Shopping with 666 (plenty of links to other 666 websites)
The Night Watchman – a look at tomorrow
Prophecy Central – all about prophecy
Warning: 666 is Coming!
Just how near is Revelation 13?
666 Mark of the Beast and Related Studies
The Mark of the New World Order: I.D. Biochip in your Right Hand! by Terry Cook
America's Identity Crisis And The Coming National I.D. Chip by Terry Cook
What you aren't being told about the Verichip
The Coming Cashless Society by Gregg London
The Mark Of The Beast (666)
Who's tracking you?
Social Chaos leads to Mark of the Beast
Moving toward a cashless society
Smart technology raises questions
Snooping by Satellite
Tracking you wherever you drive
Out of milk? Your fridge can notify your local market when it's spoiled too
Smart home appliances too smart:
http://www.spartechsoftware.com/dimensions/mystical/MarkOfTheBeast.htm
How does the world today fulfill the End Times?
Conspiracy Planet - National ID Cards/Microchips - Mark of the Beast: Get Chipped (TM)
Shopping with 666 (plenty of links to other 666 websites)
The Night Watchman – a look at tomorrow
Prophecy Central – all about prophecy
Warning: 666 is Coming!
Just how near is Revelation 13?
666 Mark of the Beast and Related Studies
The Mark of the New World Order: I.D. Biochip in your Right Hand! by Terry Cook
America's Identity Crisis And The Coming National I.D. Chip by Terry Cook
Signs, signs, everywhere are signs - Pt. 1
666 = in Greek numerals:
hexakosioi (600)
hexekonta (60)
hex (6)
OR
Chi Xi Stigma
6 = the number of man (7 is the number of God)
6 = 3 times the number 6 to imitate the Trinity (Satan, antichrist, false prophet)
STIGMA = from a primary stizo (to "stick", i.e. prick); a mark incised or punched (for recognition of ownership), i.e. (figuratively) scar of service; a mark.
MARK = from the Greek word CHARAGMA, meaning "a stamp," "an impression," "something etched." A tattoo mark of slavers; a mark or token of infamy or disgrace; an inscription, name, stamp, label, or seal placed on an article to signify ownership, quality, manufacture, or origin.
Don't you think it's ironic that these two leading RFID/tracking implementation companies have names like "Digital Angel" and "Alien Technology" ???
Apocalypse Soon : On March 2, 1999 a patent was granted to what could well be the very precursor of the MARK:
"Method for verifying human identity during electronic sale transactions
Abstract: A method is presented for facilitating sales transactions by electronic media. A bar code or a design is tattooed on an individual. Before the sales transaction can be consummated, the tattoo is scanned with a scanner. Characteristics about the scanned tattoo are compared to characteristics about other tattoos stored on a computer database in order to verify the identity of the buyer. Once verified, the seller may be authorized to debit the buyer's electronic bank account in order to consummate the transaction. The seller's electronic bank account may be similarly updated."
hexakosioi (600)
hexekonta (60)
hex (6)
OR
Chi Xi Stigma
6 = the number of man (7 is the number of God)
6 = 3 times the number 6 to imitate the Trinity (Satan, antichrist, false prophet)
STIGMA = from a primary stizo (to "stick", i.e. prick); a mark incised or punched (for recognition of ownership), i.e. (figuratively) scar of service; a mark.
MARK = from the Greek word CHARAGMA, meaning "a stamp," "an impression," "something etched." A tattoo mark of slavers; a mark or token of infamy or disgrace; an inscription, name, stamp, label, or seal placed on an article to signify ownership, quality, manufacture, or origin.
Don't you think it's ironic that these two leading RFID/tracking implementation companies have names like "Digital Angel" and "Alien Technology" ???
Apocalypse Soon : On March 2, 1999 a patent was granted to what could well be the very precursor of the MARK:
"Method for verifying human identity during electronic sale transactions
Abstract: A method is presented for facilitating sales transactions by electronic media. A bar code or a design is tattooed on an individual. Before the sales transaction can be consummated, the tattoo is scanned with a scanner. Characteristics about the scanned tattoo are compared to characteristics about other tattoos stored on a computer database in order to verify the identity of the buyer. Once verified, the seller may be authorized to debit the buyer's electronic bank account in order to consummate the transaction. The seller's electronic bank account may be similarly updated."
Palestinian / Islamic Media Watch
We need to understand what we are fighting. We are not merely at war against a "religion of peace", we are fighting a culture of death. There are many in our country who think that by simply pulling out of the war and going through diplomatic channels, this will make the world a peaceful, happy place, where we can all hold hands, sing "Kumbaya" and everything will be sweetness and light. Those people are blind and they are wrong. If you don't believe me, take a look at the websites below, and the pictures and videos contained within. They will blow your mind.
(this first one is from a recent protest in London over the cartoons that caused so much controversy--over cartoons!)
Now why would they cover their faces while carrying those signs if they're so proud:
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/004448.htm
These 2 websites may be some of the most important out there, because they show Muslim extremism in its own words. The sites track and follow Palestinian/Islamic media sources, and how they corrupt and propagandize the truth, similar to Orwell's novel "1984." What's really frightening are all the videos and TV clips aimed at--and featuring--little children!
http://www.pmw.org.il/
http://www.memritv.org/
The video below is also noteworthy. Its a debate featuring a woman named Wafa Sultan, taken from Al Jazeera television. She is one of the very few from that region who has spoken out vocally against Muslim extremism. Notice toward the end of the debate that the Muslim guy she's debating seems to have no argument at all--he merely pooh-poohs her, saying she's not worthy of a response...which proves her point right there.
http://switch5.castup.net/frames/20041020_MemriTV_Popup/video_480x360.asp?ai=214&ar=1050wmv&ak=null
(this first one is from a recent protest in London over the cartoons that caused so much controversy--over cartoons!)
Now why would they cover their faces while carrying those signs if they're so proud:
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/004448.htm
These 2 websites may be some of the most important out there, because they show Muslim extremism in its own words. The sites track and follow Palestinian/Islamic media sources, and how they corrupt and propagandize the truth, similar to Orwell's novel "1984." What's really frightening are all the videos and TV clips aimed at--and featuring--little children!
http://www.pmw.org.il/
http://www.memritv.org/
The video below is also noteworthy. Its a debate featuring a woman named Wafa Sultan, taken from Al Jazeera television. She is one of the very few from that region who has spoken out vocally against Muslim extremism. Notice toward the end of the debate that the Muslim guy she's debating seems to have no argument at all--he merely pooh-poohs her, saying she's not worthy of a response...which proves her point right there.
http://switch5.castup.net/frames/20041020_MemriTV_Popup/video_480x360.asp?ai=214&ar=1050wmv&ak=null
Abortions linked to breast cancer
While abortion has yet to be identified as the leading cause of breast cancer, insofar as it is elective, it is the most preventable…
Following is a partial list of various medical studies linking induced abortion with breast cancer as of 1996. Several other studies since then have drawn similar conclusions:
1. There was a higher rate of both spontaneous and induced abortions among breast cancer patients; increased risk ranged from 100 percent to 400 percent among the different subgroups. � M. Segi, I. Fukushima; M. Kurihara; �An Epidemiological Study of Cancer in Japan,� GANN, Vol. 48 (1957)
2. �There was a significant excess of [cancer] cases reporting one or more abortions.� � S. Yuasa and B. McMahon, �Lactation and Reproductive Histories of Breast-Cancer Patients in Tokyo, Japan,� Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Vol. 42 (1970)
3. Women with one or more abortions had a cancer risk 50 percent higher than that of women who have not had an abortion; with two or more abortions, the risk rose to 100 percent. � T.M. Lin; K.P. Chen; B. McMahon, �Epidemiologica Characteristics of Cancer in the Breast in Taiwan,� Cancer, Vol. 27 (1970)
4. Thirty-seven percent of patients who developed breast cancer after menopause have had at least one abortion, while only 27 percent of women with other cancers reported having had an abortion. � K. Stavarky and S. Emmons, Breast Cancer in Pre-Menopausal and Post-Menopausal Women,� Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 53 (1974)
5. The rate of breast cancer among women in Finland increased with the number of abortions. � I. Soini, �Risk Factors of Breast Cancer in Finland,� International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 6 (1977)
6. Women whose pregnancies lasted four months or less showed a statistically significant increase in breast cancer.– N.W. Choi; G.R. Howe; A.B. Miller; V. Matthews; R.W. Morgan; L. Munan; J.D. Burch; J. Feather; M. Jain; A. Kelly, “An Epidemiologic Study of Breast Cancer,” American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 107 (1978)
7. A case-controlled study in the North Caucasus, Soviet Union, found an increased risk of 240 percent in women with three or more induced abortions. With one or two induced abortions, the increase in risk was 100 percent. –V.V. Dvoirin and A.B. Medvedev, “The Role of Reproductive History in Breast Cancer Causation,” Methods and Results of Studies of Breast Cancer Epidemiology, Tallinn, Estonia (in Russian) (1978)
8. “Pregnancies of less than four to five months duration may be associated with an increased risk.” – J.L.Kelsey, “A Review of the Epidemiology of Human Breast Cancer,” Epidemiology Review, Vol 1 (1979)
9. First-trimester abortion of first pregnancies led to increased risk of 140 percent among women under 32 years of age. – M.C. Pike; B.E. Henderson; J.T. Casagrande; I Rosario; G.E.Gray; “Oral Contraceptive Use and Early Abortion as Risk Factors for Breast Cancer in Young Women,” British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 43 (1981)
10. Women with one abortion had twice as many recurrences of cancer as those with none; women with two or more abortions had three times as many recurrences of cancer. – H.E. Ownby; S. Martino; L.D. Roi; L. Howard; J. Russo; S. Brooks; M.J. Brennan, “Interrupted Pregnancy as One Indicator of Poor Prognosis in t1, T2, No, Mo Primary Breast Cancer,” Breast Cancer Resources and Treatment, Vol. 3 (1983)
11. The risk of developing breast cancer was 52 percent higher among women with an induced abortion than for women who had no abortions. – T. Hirohata, T. Shigematsu, A.M.Y. Nomura, “Occurrence of Breast Cancer in Relation to Diet and Reproductive History: A Case-Control Study in Fukuoka, Japan,” National Cancer Institutute, Vol. 69 (1985)
12. Abortion before a first live birth, after adjusting for other known risk factors, increased the risk of developing breast cancer by 250 percent. – O.C. Hadjimichael, C.A. Boyle, J.W. Meigs, “Abortion Before First Live Birth and Risk of Breast Cancer,” British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 53 (1986)
13. The termination of a first pregnancy before 28 weeks increased the risk of cancer by 43 percent; two or more abortions before the first full pregnancy increased the risk by 73 percent; one induced abortion with no live births increased the risk by 285 percent. – M. Ewertz; S.W. Duffy, “Risk of Breast Cancer in Relation to Reproductive Factors in Denmark,” British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 58 (1988)
14. Among women who developed breast cancer while pregnant: those who carried pregnancy to term had a 20 % survival rate; women who miscarried received more aggressive treatment and had a 42 % survival rate; but every woman who chose abortion died. – R.M. Clark and T. Chua, “Breast Cancer and Pregnancy: The Ultimate Challenge,” Clinical Oncology of the Royal College of Radiology, Vol. 1 (1989)
15. The abortion of a first pregnancy led to an increased risk of 90 %, and repeated abortions heightened the risk by 300 %. – H.L. Howe; R.T. Senie; H. Bzduch; P. Herzfeld, “Early Abortion and Breast Cancer Risk Among Women Under 40,” International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 18 (1989)
16. Women who had an abortion before a live birth had an 88 % greater risk of breast cancer than did women who had a live birth before an abortion. – B.M. Lindefors-Harris; G. Eglund; O. Meirik; L.E. Rutqvist; K. Wiklund, “Risk of Cancer of the Breast After Legal Abortion During First Trimester: A Swedish Register Study,” British Medical Journal, Vol. 299 (1989)
17. Aborting a first pregnancy led to more aggressive cancer tumors. – H. Olsson; J. Ranstam; B. Baldetorp; S.B. Ewers; M. Ferno; D. Killander; H. Sigurdsson, “Proliferation and DNA Ploidy in Malignant Breast Tumors in Relation to Early Oral Contraceptive Use and Early Abortions,” Cancer, Vol. 67 (1991)
18. Breast cancers of women who aborted their first pregnancy showed many times the normal rate of INT2—a specific gene associated with breast cancer. – H. Olsson; A. Borg; M. Ferno; J. Ranstam; H. Sigurdsson, “Her-2/neu and INT2 Proto-Oncogene Amplification in Malignant Breast Tumors in Relation to Reproductive Factors and Exposure to Exogenous Hormones,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 83 (1991)
Source: LIME 5 (the book), available from Life Dynamics (see klanparenthood.com)
More in-depth/ updated info is available at abortionbreastcancer.com, cbrinfo.com, all.org, and afterabortion.org.
Following is a partial list of various medical studies linking induced abortion with breast cancer as of 1996. Several other studies since then have drawn similar conclusions:
1. There was a higher rate of both spontaneous and induced abortions among breast cancer patients; increased risk ranged from 100 percent to 400 percent among the different subgroups. � M. Segi, I. Fukushima; M. Kurihara; �An Epidemiological Study of Cancer in Japan,� GANN, Vol. 48 (1957)
2. �There was a significant excess of [cancer] cases reporting one or more abortions.� � S. Yuasa and B. McMahon, �Lactation and Reproductive Histories of Breast-Cancer Patients in Tokyo, Japan,� Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Vol. 42 (1970)
3. Women with one or more abortions had a cancer risk 50 percent higher than that of women who have not had an abortion; with two or more abortions, the risk rose to 100 percent. � T.M. Lin; K.P. Chen; B. McMahon, �Epidemiologica Characteristics of Cancer in the Breast in Taiwan,� Cancer, Vol. 27 (1970)
4. Thirty-seven percent of patients who developed breast cancer after menopause have had at least one abortion, while only 27 percent of women with other cancers reported having had an abortion. � K. Stavarky and S. Emmons, Breast Cancer in Pre-Menopausal and Post-Menopausal Women,� Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 53 (1974)
5. The rate of breast cancer among women in Finland increased with the number of abortions. � I. Soini, �Risk Factors of Breast Cancer in Finland,� International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 6 (1977)
6. Women whose pregnancies lasted four months or less showed a statistically significant increase in breast cancer.– N.W. Choi; G.R. Howe; A.B. Miller; V. Matthews; R.W. Morgan; L. Munan; J.D. Burch; J. Feather; M. Jain; A. Kelly, “An Epidemiologic Study of Breast Cancer,” American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 107 (1978)
7. A case-controlled study in the North Caucasus, Soviet Union, found an increased risk of 240 percent in women with three or more induced abortions. With one or two induced abortions, the increase in risk was 100 percent. –V.V. Dvoirin and A.B. Medvedev, “The Role of Reproductive History in Breast Cancer Causation,” Methods and Results of Studies of Breast Cancer Epidemiology, Tallinn, Estonia (in Russian) (1978)
8. “Pregnancies of less than four to five months duration may be associated with an increased risk.” – J.L.Kelsey, “A Review of the Epidemiology of Human Breast Cancer,” Epidemiology Review, Vol 1 (1979)
9. First-trimester abortion of first pregnancies led to increased risk of 140 percent among women under 32 years of age. – M.C. Pike; B.E. Henderson; J.T. Casagrande; I Rosario; G.E.Gray; “Oral Contraceptive Use and Early Abortion as Risk Factors for Breast Cancer in Young Women,” British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 43 (1981)
10. Women with one abortion had twice as many recurrences of cancer as those with none; women with two or more abortions had three times as many recurrences of cancer. – H.E. Ownby; S. Martino; L.D. Roi; L. Howard; J. Russo; S. Brooks; M.J. Brennan, “Interrupted Pregnancy as One Indicator of Poor Prognosis in t1, T2, No, Mo Primary Breast Cancer,” Breast Cancer Resources and Treatment, Vol. 3 (1983)
11. The risk of developing breast cancer was 52 percent higher among women with an induced abortion than for women who had no abortions. – T. Hirohata, T. Shigematsu, A.M.Y. Nomura, “Occurrence of Breast Cancer in Relation to Diet and Reproductive History: A Case-Control Study in Fukuoka, Japan,” National Cancer Institutute, Vol. 69 (1985)
12. Abortion before a first live birth, after adjusting for other known risk factors, increased the risk of developing breast cancer by 250 percent. – O.C. Hadjimichael, C.A. Boyle, J.W. Meigs, “Abortion Before First Live Birth and Risk of Breast Cancer,” British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 53 (1986)
13. The termination of a first pregnancy before 28 weeks increased the risk of cancer by 43 percent; two or more abortions before the first full pregnancy increased the risk by 73 percent; one induced abortion with no live births increased the risk by 285 percent. – M. Ewertz; S.W. Duffy, “Risk of Breast Cancer in Relation to Reproductive Factors in Denmark,” British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 58 (1988)
14. Among women who developed breast cancer while pregnant: those who carried pregnancy to term had a 20 % survival rate; women who miscarried received more aggressive treatment and had a 42 % survival rate; but every woman who chose abortion died. – R.M. Clark and T. Chua, “Breast Cancer and Pregnancy: The Ultimate Challenge,” Clinical Oncology of the Royal College of Radiology, Vol. 1 (1989)
15. The abortion of a first pregnancy led to an increased risk of 90 %, and repeated abortions heightened the risk by 300 %. – H.L. Howe; R.T. Senie; H. Bzduch; P. Herzfeld, “Early Abortion and Breast Cancer Risk Among Women Under 40,” International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 18 (1989)
16. Women who had an abortion before a live birth had an 88 % greater risk of breast cancer than did women who had a live birth before an abortion. – B.M. Lindefors-Harris; G. Eglund; O. Meirik; L.E. Rutqvist; K. Wiklund, “Risk of Cancer of the Breast After Legal Abortion During First Trimester: A Swedish Register Study,” British Medical Journal, Vol. 299 (1989)
17. Aborting a first pregnancy led to more aggressive cancer tumors. – H. Olsson; J. Ranstam; B. Baldetorp; S.B. Ewers; M. Ferno; D. Killander; H. Sigurdsson, “Proliferation and DNA Ploidy in Malignant Breast Tumors in Relation to Early Oral Contraceptive Use and Early Abortions,” Cancer, Vol. 67 (1991)
18. Breast cancers of women who aborted their first pregnancy showed many times the normal rate of INT2—a specific gene associated with breast cancer. – H. Olsson; A. Borg; M. Ferno; J. Ranstam; H. Sigurdsson, “Her-2/neu and INT2 Proto-Oncogene Amplification in Malignant Breast Tumors in Relation to Reproductive Factors and Exposure to Exogenous Hormones,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 83 (1991)
Source: LIME 5 (the book), available from Life Dynamics (see klanparenthood.com)
More in-depth/ updated info is available at abortionbreastcancer.com, cbrinfo.com, all.org, and afterabortion.org.
The 'androgynifying' of Canada
And in the "How stupid are they?" contest, we have a winner:
Man and Woman, Wife, Husband, Widow, Widower Banished From all Ontario Law:
A perusal of the bill shows substitutions for previously used spousal terms in numerous places throughout 73 Ontario Statutes as follows:
“Widows”, widowers” replaced by “surviving spouses”
“A person of the opposite sex” replaced by “a person”
“Wives, husbands” replaced by “spouses”
“Two persons of the opposite sex” replaced by “two persons”
“The wife or husband” replaced by “spouse”
“A husband or wife” replaced by “spouse”
“The husband and wife” replaced by “the spouses”
“A man and a woman” replaced by “two persons”
“Husband and wife” replaced by “spouses”
“Cohabited as man and wife” replaced by “cohabited as a married couple”
“Same-sex partner” replaced by “spouse”
Soon we'll all just be smooth, genderless plastic dolls.
Man and Woman, Wife, Husband, Widow, Widower Banished From all Ontario Law:
A perusal of the bill shows substitutions for previously used spousal terms in numerous places throughout 73 Ontario Statutes as follows:
“Widows”, widowers” replaced by “surviving spouses”
“A person of the opposite sex” replaced by “a person”
“Wives, husbands” replaced by “spouses”
“Two persons of the opposite sex” replaced by “two persons”
“The wife or husband” replaced by “spouse”
“A husband or wife” replaced by “spouse”
“The husband and wife” replaced by “the spouses”
“A man and a woman” replaced by “two persons”
“Husband and wife” replaced by “spouses”
“Cohabited as man and wife” replaced by “cohabited as a married couple”
“Same-sex partner” replaced by “spouse”
Soon we'll all just be smooth, genderless plastic dolls.
Accepted? I think NOT
Bi? Study Says More Women Try It - CBS News:
"'It's a lot easier for women to have these kinds of experiences and be open about it because it's more accepted.'"
I don't think the word "accepted" is acceptable.
"'It's a lot easier for women to have these kinds of experiences and be open about it because it's more accepted.'"
I don't think the word "accepted" is acceptable.
Iran: Jews, Christians Must Wear Badges
Hmm. Now where have we heard about this "must wear badges" thing before?
Iran: Jews, Christians Must Wear Badges
Iran: Jews, Christians Must Wear Badges
3 Egyptian students taken into custody
they were going to school in MONTANA??? Hello?!? Is anyone paying attention???
3 Egyptian students taken into custody
3 Egyptian students taken into custody
There go our 2nd Amendment rights
The United Nations is Coming After Your Second Amendment Rights
Aug 1, 2006
By Matthew Dailey
The United Nations concluded it Small Arms Review Conference in New York City on July 7th. The stated purpose of the meeting was to curb the illicit global trade in small arms.
While the stated goal sounded non-controversial and benign, the ultimate purpose of the conference backers is to have a binding international treaty that will severely restrict civilian gun ownership in the United States.
U.N. bureaucrats, who are not elected or accountable to the American people, are aiming to impose severe restrictions on the legal gun trade in an attempt to stop the illegal arms trade. A host of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), working in concert with the United Nations, are working towards gutting our Second Amendment rights.
One organization that is a major backer in restricting civilian gun ownership is the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), headed by Rebecca Peters. She heads a coalition that pursues a strategy to confiscate, ban, and destroy guns.
The U.N. Small Arms Review Conference that took place in New York City is another attempt by gun control advocates to push for an international gun ban treaty. It is an assault on our core freedoms protected by the Constitution.
The Libertarian Party passed a resolution condemning the 2006 U.N. Small Arms Review Conference at its national convention in Portland, Oregon.
The resolution reads as follows:
WHEREAS all individuals are endowed by God or Nature certain unalienable rights as specified by the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, particularly the first ten Amendments (the Bill of Rights), which is the supreme law of the land,
WHEREAS the Second Amendment to the Constitution unconditionally guarantees to the individual the right to keep and bear arms, which is one of these natural rights,
WHEREAS the Libertarian Party Platform calls for that unconditional guarantee of the right to keep and bear arms,
and WHEREAS, right now, as the Libertarian Party National Convention meets here and as our nation celebrates its founding and its Constitution, the United Nations is right here in America insulting the American people, the United States Constitution and our country's national sovereignty by holding its 2006 Small Arms Review Conference, which is devising ways and means to confiscate our lawful property and means of self-defense,
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED that the Libertarian Party, in the strongest possible terms, condemns the United Nations 2006 Small Arms Review Conference.
If more gun control advocates are elected to Congress and the White House, the U.N.'s global ban on guns will become a reality.
Only by electing Libertarian Party candidates to Congress can we defend our Second Amendment rights and protect our nation's sovereignty.
Aug 1, 2006
By Matthew Dailey
The United Nations concluded it Small Arms Review Conference in New York City on July 7th. The stated purpose of the meeting was to curb the illicit global trade in small arms.
While the stated goal sounded non-controversial and benign, the ultimate purpose of the conference backers is to have a binding international treaty that will severely restrict civilian gun ownership in the United States.
U.N. bureaucrats, who are not elected or accountable to the American people, are aiming to impose severe restrictions on the legal gun trade in an attempt to stop the illegal arms trade. A host of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), working in concert with the United Nations, are working towards gutting our Second Amendment rights.
One organization that is a major backer in restricting civilian gun ownership is the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), headed by Rebecca Peters. She heads a coalition that pursues a strategy to confiscate, ban, and destroy guns.
The U.N. Small Arms Review Conference that took place in New York City is another attempt by gun control advocates to push for an international gun ban treaty. It is an assault on our core freedoms protected by the Constitution.
The Libertarian Party passed a resolution condemning the 2006 U.N. Small Arms Review Conference at its national convention in Portland, Oregon.
The resolution reads as follows:
WHEREAS all individuals are endowed by God or Nature certain unalienable rights as specified by the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, particularly the first ten Amendments (the Bill of Rights), which is the supreme law of the land,
WHEREAS the Second Amendment to the Constitution unconditionally guarantees to the individual the right to keep and bear arms, which is one of these natural rights,
WHEREAS the Libertarian Party Platform calls for that unconditional guarantee of the right to keep and bear arms,
and WHEREAS, right now, as the Libertarian Party National Convention meets here and as our nation celebrates its founding and its Constitution, the United Nations is right here in America insulting the American people, the United States Constitution and our country's national sovereignty by holding its 2006 Small Arms Review Conference, which is devising ways and means to confiscate our lawful property and means of self-defense,
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED that the Libertarian Party, in the strongest possible terms, condemns the United Nations 2006 Small Arms Review Conference.
If more gun control advocates are elected to Congress and the White House, the U.N.'s global ban on guns will become a reality.
Only by electing Libertarian Party candidates to Congress can we defend our Second Amendment rights and protect our nation's sovereignty.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
America is cracking up. Literally. 😲 (finally I can say literally and actually mean it!) We are about to experience two very signif... -
An oh-so-pithy OpEd piece by Hanna Shtein (not making that up), who is a Philosophy major at UW-Wisconsin Madison, writing for the Badger H...
-
WAKE UP !!! Like the loving parent who gently shakes a child to wake him up, God is shaking the world today in an attempt to wake us from ...